Is it initiatory force to force one parent to pay child support to the other?
June 15th, 2009 | 
Author: Twelve Visions Party’s Statement: …The government cannot commit initiatory force on parents. The only time government can force parents to provide child support is if a legal contract is violated. Separated parents and their children will have to work out for themselves who will have custody. They will have to do this without using initiatory force.
Posted in 
Tags: 
As for the child support system. One major inadequacy is if the child support was set up when the parent had a good job and later that parent loses that higher paying job, in many cases (not all) that parent is left having to pay an amount that he or she can no longer feasibly afford. I’ve also seen stories in the news where after years of paying child support, a parent discovers that the child was not his, but was still legally required to pay.
Child support can’t be fair in today’s world as it is controlled by our government’ org. and those that lie or know how to work the crooked system get the most in most states. Am I right that this is neo-cheating?
I feel that if someone does not pay their child support they are not protecting their child. therefore I would not want them to be able to protect themselves
Throwing money at the spouse for the purpose of supporting the children does not ensure that the child/children benefit from those monies. Many times the courts are only trying to ensure that the spouse does not loose the style of living that was enjoyed by the spouse who has custody. The children very often receive little or benefit from the child support.
This is my question: Is it Initiatory force for someone not to support their child and if so Why?
1. Yes! It is Initiatory Force for parents not to support their children. Why, because children defenseless in the world without proper financial support, in terms of life’s basic needs; food, clothing, shelter, education and mentorship and so on.
2. Currently the Law attempts to hold parents responsible for their decisions to have and children. Perhaps, The Law assumes that there are no mistakes in the decision to have a child among consenting parents. [In other words Rape and Incest in not a factor] This consummates the Family Blood- Line.
3. Let’s consider this argument in terms of tax benefits. The government allows tax deductions for each dependant. Also, there are tax deductions for Alimony, and Child Support. The decision to divorce is personal between parents; and ideally the children are still “entitled” to the nurturing care of both parents.
4. When the person(s) who generally earns the most income willfully agrees to pay child support to take care of his/her parents, they will receipt just compensation in terms of proper tax benefits and tax deductions.
I was making more money than my husband before I got divorced. Now I am unemployed. Do you think I should take him back to court to get more money? Or, should I accept the fact that its been settled? In the meantime, the kids are not living like they were used to live. I believe the kids should come 1st no matter what the circumstances. Their needs need to be met first.